4.8 Review

The coordination nanosheet (CONASH)

Journal

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
Volume 320, Issue -, Pages 118-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.12.001

Keywords

Nanosheet; Two-dimensional materials; Metal complex; Nanomaterials; Nanotechnology; Scanning probe microscopy

Funding

  1. JST-PRESTO Hyper-nano-space design toward Innovative Functionality
  2. JST-CREST Development of Atomic or Molecular Two-Dimensional Functional Films and Creation of Fundamental Technologies for Their Applications
  3. MEXT of Japan [26708005, 26107510, 26220801, 15H00862, 15K13654]
  4. Asahi Glass Foundation
  5. Iketani Science and Technology Foundation
  6. MIKIYA Science and Technology Foundation
  7. Yazaki Memorial Foundation for Science and Technology
  8. Shorai Foundation for Science and Technology
  9. Hitachi Global Foundation
  10. Kumagai Foundation for Science and Technology
  11. Foundation for Interaction in Science & Technology (FIST)
  12. Foundation Advanced Technology Institute
  13. Izumi Science and Technology Foundation
  14. Foundation for The Promotion of Ion Engineering
  15. LIXIL JS Foundation
  16. IWATANI NAOJI foundation
  17. JSPS
  18. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H00862, 26708005, 15J06673, 15K13654, 13J08382, 26107510, 26620039] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review presents recent progress relating to metal-complex two-dimensional polymers, coordination nanosheets (CONASHs), an emerging class of material. Section 2 summarizes CONASHs fabricated by dry processes, such as organic molecular beam epitaxy and electron beam heating evaporation under ultra-high vacuum conditions. Section 3 describes CONASHs fabricated by wet processes, such as liquid/liquid and gas/liquid interfacial reactions. Section 4 describes the potential applications of CONASHs in nanomaterial science. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available