4.4 Review

Tactile innervation densities across the whole body

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue 4, Pages 1229-1240

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00313.2020

Keywords

afferent; glabrous skin; hairy skin; homunculus; mechanoreceptor

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [209998/Z/17/Z]
  2. EU [813713]
  3. Wellcome Trust [209998/Z/17/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The skin is our largest sensory organ and innervated by afferent fibers carrying tactile information to the spinal cord and onto the brain. The density with which different classes of tactile afferents innervate the skin is not constant but varies considerably across different body regions. However, precise estimates of innervation density are only available for some body parts, such as the hands, and estimates of the total number of tactile afferent fibers are inconsistent and incomplete. Here we reconcile different estimates and provide plausible ranges and best estimates for the number of different tactile fiber types innervating different regions of the skin, using evidence from dorsal root fiber counts, microneurography, histology, and psychophysics. We estimate that the skin across the whole body of young adults is innervated by similar to 230,000 tactile afferent fibers (plausible range: 200,000-270,000), with a subsequent decrement of 5-8% every decade due to aging. Fifteen percent of fibers innervate the palmar skin of both hands and 19% the region surrounding the face and lips. Slowly and fast-adapting fibers are split roughly evenly, but this breakdown varies with skin region. Innervation density correlates well with psychophysical spatial acuity across different body regions, and, additionally, on hairy skin, with hair follicle density. Innervation density is also weakly correlated with the size of the cortical somatotopic representation but cannot fully account for the magnification of the hands and the face.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available