4.4 Article

Critical assessment of the FeC and CO bond strength in carboxymyoglobin: a QM/MM local vibrational mode study

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-020-04519-w

Keywords

Vibrational spectroscopy; Myoglobin; Local vibrational theory; Local mode force constants; DFT; QM; MM

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE 1464906]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interplay between FeC and CO bonding in carboxymyoglobin (MbCO) and the role of potential hydrogen bonding between the CO moiety and the side chains of the surrounding protein amino acids have been the subject of numerous experimental and theoretical studies. In this work, we present a quantitative measure for the intrinsic FeC and CO bond strength in MbCO, as well as for COH bonding, based on the local vibrational mode analysis, originally developed by Konkoli and Cremer. We investigated a gas phase model, two models of the wild-type protein, and 17 protein mutations that change the distal polarity of the heme pocket, as well as two protein mutations of the heme porphyrin ring. Based on local mode force constants, we could quantify for the first time the suggested inverse relationship between the CO and FeC bond strength, the strength of COH bonding, and how it weakens the CO bond. Combined with the natural orbital analysis, we could also confirm the key role of back donation between Fe and the CO moiety in determining the FeC bond strength. We further clarified that CO and FeC normal modes couple with other protein motions in the protein environment. Therefore, normal mode frequencies/force constants are not suited as bond strength descriptors and instead their local mode counterparts should be used. Our comprehensive results provide new guidelines for the fine-tuning of existing and the design of MbCO models with specific FeC, CO, and COH bond strengths.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available