4.7 Review

COVID-19 Mobile Apps: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/23170

Keywords

mobile apps; systematic survey; COVID-19; mobile health; eHealth

Funding

  1. Computational Biomedicine Lab
  2. Center for eHealth Applications and Services of the Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas
  3. Information Technologies Institute of the Centre for Research and Technology - Hellas
  4. KRIPIS project Novel technologies to monitor, support and improve the quality of life of patients and other vulnerable user groups (Quality of Life)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A vast amount of mobile apps have been developed during the past few months in an attempt to flatten the curve of the increasing number of COVID-19 cases. Objective: This systematic review aims to shed light into studies found in the scientific literature that have used and evaluated mobile apps for the prevention, management, treatment, or follow-up of COVID-19. Methods: We searched the bibliographic databases Global Literature on Coronavims Disease, PubMed, and Scopus to identify papers focusing on mobile apps for COVID-19 that show evidence of their real-life use and have been developed involving clinical professionals in their design or validation. Results: Mobile apps have been implemented for training, information sharing, risk assessment, self-management of symptoms, contact tracing, home monitoring, and decision making, rapidly offering effective and usable tools for managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: Mobile apps are considered to be a valuable tool for citizens, health professionals, and decision makers in facing critical challenges imposed by the pandemic, such as reducing the burden on hospitals, providing access to credible information, tracking the symptoms and mental health of individuals, and discovering new predictors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available