4.5 Article

Curie temperature modeling of magnetocaloric lanthanum manganites using Gaussian

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166998

Keywords

Curie temperature; Gaussian process regression; Lattice parameters; Magnetocaloric effects; Manganites

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient solid-state refrigeration techniques have drawn increasing attention due to their potential for improving energy efficiency of refrigeration, air-conditioning, and temperature-control systems without using harmful gas as in conventional gas compression techniques. Research on magnetocaloric lanthanum manganites with near-room-temperature Curie temperature, T-C , shows promising results for further developments of magnetic refrigeration devices. By incorporating chemical substitutions, oxygen content modifications, and various synthesis methods, these manganites experience lattice distortions from perovskite cubic structures to pseudocubic, orthorhombic, and rhombohedral structures. Further changes in lattice parameters can also be achieved by the introduction of strain due to lattice mismatches, where T-C can be tuned more effectively. Empirical results and previous models through thermodynamics and first-principles have shown that changes in lattice parameters correlate with those in T-C, but correlations are merely general tendencies and obviously not universal. In this work, the Gaussian process regression model is developed to find statistical correlations between T-C and lattice parameters among lanthanum manganites. Nearly 100 lattices, cubic, pseudocubic, orthorhombic, and rhombohedral, with T-C ranging from 40 K to 375 K are explored for this purpose. The modeling approach demonstrates a high degree of accuracy and stability, contributing to efficient and low-cost estimations of T-C, providing guidance on thin film structure design and helping understandings of magnetic phase transformations and magnetocaloric effects in lanthanum manganites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available