Journal
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 712-721Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27384
Keywords
neuromelanin; magnetic resonance imaging; substantia nigra; reliability; test-retest
Funding
- Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) [91618075]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
NM-MRI is a highly reproducible measure, with the GRE sequence showing the highest contrast and lowest variability for CR measurements.
Background Neuromelanin-sensitive MRI (NM-MRI) of the substantia nigra provides a noninvasive way to acquire an indirect measure of dopamine functioning. Despite the potential of NM-MRI as a candidate biomarker for dopaminergic pathology, studies about its reproducibility are sparse. Purpose To assess the test-retest reproducibility of three commonly used NM-MRI sequences and evaluate three analysis methods. Study Type Prospective study. Population A total of 11 healthy participants age between 20-27 years. Field Strength/Sequence 3.0T;NM-MRIgradient recalled echo (GRE) with magnetization transfer (MT) pulse;NM-MRIturbo spin echo (TSE) withMTpulse;NM-MRI TSEwithoutMTpulse. Assessment Participants were scanned twice with a 3-week interval. Manual analysis, threshold analysis, and voxelwise analysis were performed for volume and contrast ratio (CR) measurements. Statistical Tests Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for test-retest and inter- and intrarater variability. Results The GRE sequence achieved the highest contrast and lowest variability (4.9-5.7%) and showed substantial to almost perfect test-retest ICC (0.72-0.90) for CR measurements. For volume measurements, the manual analysis showed a higher variability (10.7-17.9%) and scored lower test-retest ICCs (-0.13-0.73) than the other analysis methods. The threshold analysis showed higher test-retest ICC (0.77) than the manual analysis for the volume measurements. Data Conclusion NM-MRI is a highly reproducible measure, especially when using the GRE sequence and CR measurements. Volume measurements appear to be more sensitive to inter/intrarater variability and variability in placement and orientation of the NM-MRI slab. The threshold analysis appears to be the best alternative for volume analysis. Level of Evidence 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 1
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available