4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Nanodiamond photocathodes for MPGD-based single photon detectors at future EIC

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/C09052

Keywords

Materials for gaseous detectors; Micropattern gaseous detectors (MSGC, GEM, THGEM, RETHGEM, MHSP, MICROPIC, MICROMEGAS, InGrid, etc); Photocathodes and their production; Photon detectors for UV, visible and IR photons (gas)

Funding

  1. EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, STRONG-2020 project [824093]
  2. Program Detector Generic R&D for an Electron Ion Collider by Brookhaven National Laboratory
  3. DOE Office of Nuclear Physics
  4. Jefferson Lab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We are developing gaseous photon detectors for Cherenkov imaging applications in the experiments at the future Electron Ion Collider. CsI, converting photons in the far ultraviolet range, is, so far, the only photoconverter compatible with the operation of gaseous detectors. It is very delicate to handle due to its hygroscopic nature: the absorbed water vapour decomposes the CsI molecule. In addition, its quantum efficiency degrades under ion bombardment. These are the key reasons to quest for novel, less delicate materials for photocathodes adequate for gaseous photon detectors. Layers of hydrogenated nanodiamond particles have recently been proposed as an alternative material and have shown promising characteristics. The performance of nanodiamond photocathodes coupled to thick GEM-based detectors is the objects of our ongoing R&D. The first phase of these studies includes the characterization of thick GEM coated with nanodiamond layers and the robustness of its photoconverting properties with respect to the bombardment by ions from the multiplication process in the gaseous detector. The approach is described in detail as well as all the results obtained so far within these exploratory studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available