4.4 Article

Diagnostic value of serum biomarkersFGF21andGDF15compared to muscle sample in mitochondrial disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF INHERITED METABOLIC DISEASE
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 469-480

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jimd.12307

Keywords

diagnostics of mitochondrial disease; FGF21; GDF15; mitochondrial disease; muscle biopsy

Funding

  1. Biomedicum Helsinki-saatio
  2. Doctoral Program in Biomedicine
  3. Emil Aaltosen Saatio
  4. Helsingin Yliopiston Tiedesaatio
  5. Lastentautien Tutkimussaatio
  6. Maire Taposen Saatio
  7. Maud Kuistilan Muistosaatio
  8. Orionin Tutkimussaatio
  9. Oskar Oflunds Stiftelse
  10. Sigrid Juseliuksen Saatio
  11. Stichting NeMo
  12. Suomen Laaketieteen Saatio
  13. Terveyden Tutkimuksen Toimikunta
  14. special governmental subsidy for health sciences research of the Helsinki University Hospital
  15. Waldemar von Frenckells Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that in the diagnosis of mitochondrial disease, the value of serum biomarkers FGF21 and GDF15 is higher than traditional muscle histological analysis. Additionally, if both biomarkers are elevated and the patient exhibits muscle manifesting symptoms and is affected by mitochondrial DNA expression, the likelihood of diagnosing mitochondrial disease is higher.
The aim of this study was to compare the value of serum biomarkers, fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), with histological analysis of muscle in the diagnosis of mitochondrial disease. We collected 194 serum samples from patients with a suspected or known mitochondrial disease. Biomarkers were analyzed blinded using enzyme-labeled immunosorbent assay. Clinical data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Only 39% of patients with genetically verified mitochondrial disease had mitochondrial pathology in their muscle histology. In contrast, biomarkers were elevated in 62% of patients with genetically verified mitochondrial disease. Those with both biomarkers elevated had a muscle manifesting disorder and a defect affecting mitochondrial DNA expression. If at least one of the biomarkers was induced and the patient had a myopathic disease, a mitochondrial DNA expression disease was the cause with 94% probability. Among patients with biomarker analysis and muscle biopsy taken <12 months apart, a mitochondrial disorder would have been identified in 70% with analysis of FGF21 and GDF15 compared to 50% of patients whom could have been identified with muscle biopsy alone. Muscle findings were nondiagnostic in 72% (children) and 45% (adults). Induction of FGF21 and GDF15 suggest a mitochondrial etiology as an underlying cause of a muscle manifesting disease. Normal biomarker values do not, however, rule out a mitochondrial disorder, especially if the disease does not manifest in muscle. We suggest that FGF21 and GDF15 together should be first-line diagnostic investigations in mitochondrial disease complementing muscle biopsy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available