Journal
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 205, Issue 9, Pages 2342-2350Publisher
AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000839
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health [R01AI099108, R01AI121252, R01AI117890, R01AI148652, R37AG020719]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The scale of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has thrust immunology into the public spotlight in unprecedented ways. In this article, which is part opinion piece and part review, we argue that the normal cadence by which we discuss science with our colleagues failed to properly convey likelihoods of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 to the public and the media. As a result, biologically implausible outcomes were given equal weight as the principles set by decades of viral immunology. Unsurprisingly, questionable results and alarmist news media articles have filled the void. We suggest an emphasis on setting expectations based on prior findings while avoiding the overused approach of assuming nothing. After reviewing Ab-mediated immunity after coronavirus and other acute viral infections, we posit that, with few exceptions, the development of protective humoral immunity of more than a year is the norm. Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is likely to follow the same pattern.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available