4.7 Article

A comparison between ES-MDA and restart EnKF for the purpose of the simultaneous identification of a contaminant source and hydraulic conductivity

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 595, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125681

Keywords

Contaminant source identification; Data assimilation; Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation; Restart ensemble Kalman filter

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CGL2014-59841-P]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports [PRX17/00150]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [B200201015, B200204002]
  4. Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor Program [B19052]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51679067, 51879088]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding a contaminant source is crucial for managing a polluted aquifer, but source information may be unavailable when pollutants are detected. The Ensemble Smoother with Multiple Data Assimilation (ES-MDA) is proposed as a more efficient solution than the restart Ensemble Kalman Filter (r-EnKF), but requires a large number of assimilations to achieve the same level of accuracy.
Understanding a contaminant source may help in a better management and risk assessment of a polluted aquifer. However, contaminant source information may not be available when a pollutant is detected in a drinking well. The restart ensemble Kalman filter (restart EnKF, also named r-EnKF) has been demonstrated in synthetic and laboratory experiments as an efficient solution for the identification of a contaminant source. Recently, the ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation (ES-MDA) has been proposed as an alternative to the r-EnKF as a more efficient solution given that the r-EnKF needs to restart the simulation of the state equation from time zero after each data assimilation step. An analysis, in a synthetic aquifer, of the accuracy of the ES-MDA for the simultaneous identification of a contaminant source and the spatial distribution of hydraulic conductivity by assimilating both piezometric head and concentration observations is carried out using the r-EnKF as a benchmark. The conclusion is that the ES-MDA can outperform the r-EnKF, but the expected speed advantage, associated with the possibility of assimilating all data at once, does not exist. For the ES-MDA to reach the same level of accuracy as the r-EnKF, the number of multiple data assimilations must be large, and final computing time is similar for both approaches. However, the ES-MDA can do much better than the r-EnKF if the number of iterations increases even further, with the consequent increase of computational cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available