4.7 Article

Characterization of basin-scale aquifer heterogeneity using transient hydraulic tomography with aquifer responses induced by groundwater exploitation reduction

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 588, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125137

Keywords

Hydraulic tomography; Basin-scale aquifer heterogeneity; Groundwater exploitation reduction; North China Plain

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41901039]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201808130026]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [D2019402045]
  4. Department of Education of Hebei Province [QN2018076]
  5. U.S. NSF [EAR1931756]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study exploits aquifer responses to the reduction of pumping rates at different locations in a synthetic groundwater basin as basin-scale hydraulic tomography (HT) surveys to estimate transmissivity (T) and storage coefficient (S) fields. This experiment mimics the situation of groundwater exploitation reduction in a pilot area of groundwater-overexploitation control in the North China Plain. The results of the study show that taking advantage of the groundwater exploitation reduction as HT surveys is a viable approach for basin-scale parameter estimations. Results also suggest that HT analysis should use accurate mean values of T and S for geological zones as initial guesses for the inversion of parameters. Further, we show that the T and S fields estimated from HT yield accurate predictions of the groundwater flow velocities and breakthrough curves (BTCs). However, the BTCs based on kriged and zonal mean fields are inaccurate. The predicted BTCs using homogeneous fields fail to capture the true trend of solute concentration over time. We advocate that utilizing aquifer responses induced by groundwater exploitation reduction could be a new paradigm for basin-scale aquifer characterization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available