4.7 Article

A novel upper-room UVC-LED irradiation system for disinfection of indoor bioaerosols under different operating and airflow conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 396, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122715

Keywords

Disinfection bioaerosols; IAQ; LED; Upper-room UVGI; UVC

Funding

  1. General Research Funds from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China [CityU 11273116, CityU 11204217]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential of inactivating indoor bacteria aerosols using a novel rotating ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light-emitting-diode (LED) system was investigated. The system was installed in the upper level of a full scale chamber and its effectiveness against aerosolized E. coli. S. marcescens, and S. epidermidis under the well-mixed with stationary UV-LED scenario was initially tested. The estimated susceptibility values were 1.068, 1.148, and 0.156 m(2)/J for E. coli, S. marcescens, and S. epidermidis, respectively. Three additional scenarios of experiments were conducted, in which E. coli was aerosolized into the test chamber and then allowed to decay under (i) poorly-mixed condition with stationary system, (ii) well-mixed with rotating system, and (iii) poorly-mixed conditions with rotating system. Our results showed no significant difference between the performance of stationary and rotating UR-UVGI-LED systems under a well-mixed condition. While the performance of the stationary UR-UVGI-LED system under a poorly-mixed condition decreased by 52.90-79.38 % compared to a well-mixed condition, rotating the UR-UVGI-LED system under a poorly-mixed condition, compared to the stationary system, enhanced its performance by 22.36-49.86 %. Thus, our proposed rotating irradiation offers great potential for application in environments where bioaerosols are unevenly distributed in a built environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available