4.2 Article

Combat-Sustained Peripheral Nerve Injuries in the United States Military

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.08.004

Keywords

Combat trauma; nerve surgery; peripheral nerve injury

Funding

  1. Comprehensive Neuroscience Program [MDA90502-2-0007]
  2. Comprehensive National Neuroscience Program [W81XWH-07-1-0679]
  3. Peripheral Nerve Consortium of Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (Bethesda, MD)
  4. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (Bethesda, MD) [HU0001-11-1-0004, HU0001-15-20003]
  5. Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (Bethesda, MD)
  6. [JPC-1 HU0001-17-2-0004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study described combat-sustained peripheral nerve injuries and outcomes after evaluation in a military multidisciplinary peripheral nerve clinic. Service members with more severe initial injuries had worse final outcomes and timely evaluation was associated with improved sensory recovery.
Purpose Combat-sustained peripheral nerve injuries (CSPNIs) are often the result of high-energy blast mechanisms and are increasing in frequency and severity among US forces engaged in contemporary warfare. The purpose of this study was to describe CSPNIs and report outcomes after evaluation in a military multidisciplinary peripheral nerve clinic. We hypothesized that a shorter time to evaluation by a multidisciplinary peripheral nerve team would improve outcomes. Methods The Peripheral Nerve Consortium (PNC) maintains an electronic database of all active duty service members who sustained a peripheral nerve injury (PNI) and were treated by the PNC between 2004 and 2009. This database was queried for service member demographic information, injury characteristics, wounding patterns, CSPNI description, surgical procedures, and Medical Research Council final motor and sensory outcome. Results Among the 104 service members treated by the PNC in the 6-year period reviewed, there were 138 PNIs. Average age was 27 years, time to initial evaluation by the PNC was 4 (+/- 7) months, and average follow-up was 18 (+/- 18) months. Associated injuries included fractures (31.1%), multiple PNIs (76.8%), vascular injury (30.4%), and traumatic brain injury (34.1%). There was no association between Sunderland classification and time to evaluation, mechanism of injury, or nerve injured. However, Sunderland classification was correlated with final motor and final sensory scores. Service members with better final sensory score (S1 or S2) had shorter time to initial evaluation than did patients with a final sensory score of S0 (<0.05). This did not hold true for final motor score. Conclusions Service members with more severe initial injuries had worse final outcomes. Although timely referral does not occur for most CSPNIs, a shorter time to presentation also led to improved sensory recovery. Complex combat-sustained PNIs may be best understood and treated within a multidisciplinary team. Copyright (C) 2021 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available