4.4 Article

Stable isotopes reveal contrasting trophic dynamics between host-parasite relationships: A case study of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and parasitic lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Argulus foliaceus)

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages 1821-1832

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14546

Keywords

louse; parasite; salmonid; trophic enrichment; delta C-13; delta N-15

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IIA-1355457]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Across existing fish host-parasite literature, endoparasites were depleted in delta N-15 compared to their hosts, while ectoparasitic values demonstrated enrichment, depletion and equivalence relative to their hosts. delta C-13 enrichment varied extensively for both endo- and ectoparasites across taxa and host tissues. In our case study, sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) were enriched in delta N-15 relative to their farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) hosts, although the value contradicted the average that is currently assumed across the animal kingdom. Common fish lice (Argulus foliaceus) did not show a consistent trend in delta N-15 compared to their wildS. salarhosts. Both parasitic species had a range of delta C-13 enrichment patterns relative to their hosts. Farmed and wildS. salarhad contrasting delta C-13 and delta N-15, and signals varied across muscle, fin and skin within both groups.L. salmonisandA. foliaceussubsequently had unique delta C-13 and delta N-15, andL. salmonisfrom opposite US coasts differed in delta N-15. Given the range of enrichment patterns that were exhibited across the literature and in our study system, trophic dynamics from host to parasite do not conform to traditional prey to predator standards. Furthermore, there does not appear to be a universal enrichment pathway for delta C-13 nor delta N-15 in parasitic relationships, which emphasizes the need to investigate host-parasite linkages across species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available