4.7 Review

Medicine in motion: Opportunities, challenges and data analytics-based solutions for traditional medicine integration into western medical practice

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 267, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113477

Keywords

Pain; Traditional medicine; Indigenous medicine; Healthcare economics; Phytomedicine; Network pharmacology

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute 'Inclusive Excellence' program grant [52008701]
  2. GB Sciences Research Award
  3. NIH [COBRE P20GM113134, R15DK00978]
  4. NSF AISL [1811691]
  5. NSF INCLUDES [1744526]
  6. Division Of Human Resource Development
  7. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1744526] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional pharmacopeias, developed by multiple cultures, require hard evidence for efficacy to separate science from pseudoscience; factors like abstraction, simplification, and altered dose influence the actual and perceived efficacy of medicines; integrating traditional therapies into healthcare systems with regulation and evidence-based practice, along with new data analytics approaches, are key areas of emphasis for future research.
Ethnopharmacological relevance: Traditional pharmacopeias have been developed by multiple cultures and evaluated for efficacy and safety through both historical/empirical iteration and more recently through controlled studies using Western scientific paradigms and an increasing emphasis on data science methodologies for network pharmacology. Traditional medicines represent likely sources of relatively inexpensive drugs for symptomatic management as well as potential libraries of new therapeutic approaches. Leveraging this potential requires hard evidence for efficacy that separates science from pseudoscience. Materials and methods: We performed a review of non-Western medical systems and developed case studies that illustrate the epistemological and practical translative barriers that hamper their transition to integration with Western approaches. We developed a new data analytics approach, in silico convergence analysis, to deconvolve modes of action, and potentially predict desirable components of TM-derived formulations based on computational consensus analysis across cultures and medical systems. Results: Abstraction, simplification and altered dose and delivery modalities were identified as factors that influence actual and perceived efficacy once a medicine is moved from a non-Western to Western setting. Case studies on these factors highlighted issues with translation between non-Western and Western epistemologies, including those where epistemological and medicinal systems drive markets that can be epicenters for zoonoses such as the novel Coronavirus. The proposed novel data science approach demonstrated the ability to identify and predict desirable medicinal components for a test indication, pain. Conclusions: Relegation of traditional therapies to the relatively unregulated nutraceutical industry may lead healthcare providers and patients to underestimate the therapeutic potential of these medicines. We suggest three areas of emphasis for this field: First, vertical integration and embedding of traditional medicines into healthcare systems would subject them to appropriate regulation and evidence-based practice, as viable integrative implementation mode. Second, we offer a new Bradford-Hill-like framework for setting research priorities and evaluating efficacy, with the goal of rescuing potentially valuable therapies from the nutraceutical market and discrediting those that are pseudoscience. Third, data analytics pipelines offer new capacity to generate new types of TMS-inspired medicines that are rationally-designed based on integrated knowledge across cultures, and also provide an evaluative framework against which to test claims of fidelity and efficacy to TMS made for nutraceuticals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available