4.7 Article

Effect of activator concentration on the strength, ITZ and drying shrinkage of fly ash/slag geopolymer concrete

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages 171-179

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.008

Keywords

Geopolymer concrete; Fly ash; Drying shrinkage; ITZ; Impact

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geopolymerization of fly ash and slag in a single mix was studied at ambient condition with the help of an Isothermal conduction calorimetry. Increasing activator concentration in the mix led to its shortening of the induction time as well as peak position shifting in the calorimetric curves which showed more workability loss and faster setting. Geopolymer concrete made with fly ash/slag composite mix and various activator concentrations was evaluated for its mechanical properties, age hardening and drying shrinkage. The optimum compressive strength of concrete mix was obtained at 14 M activator concentration. The presence of spongy amorphous geopolymer pastes extended onto the aggregate surface as viewed under Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) images supported satisfactory aggregate-paste interface in the concrete. The compressive strength, elastic modulus and impact strength increased and the Poisson's ratio decreased with increasing activator concentration. Under repeated drop weight impact, the specimens failed between 95 and 224 hammer blows depending on the activator concentrations. Geopolymer concrete gained an early strength compared with the OPC concrete as predicted by the equation specified in ACI 209R-92. The drying shrinkage of samples was similar to 0.1%only at the age of 6 months. It is concluded that fly ash/slag geopolymer concrete can be satisfactorily produced at room temperature with a desired compressive strength similar to that of OPC concrete. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available