4.7 Article

Effect of early carbonation curing on chloride penetration and weathering carbonation in concrete

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages 516-526

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.041

Keywords

Carbonation curing; Concrete; Fly ash concrete; Chloride content; Weathering carbonation

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. Climate Change and Emissions Management Corporation (CCEMC) of Alberta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early carbonation curing of concretes was developed for accelerating the strength gain and promoting carbon dioxide utilization in concrete. However, the effect of early carbonation curing on chloride penetration was not clear. it was reported that weathering carbonation of concrete could increase chloride penetration. The purpose of this paper is to examine if early carbonation curing would also accelerate the chloride penetration and the weathering carbonation depth in concrete during service. Both carbonation cured and hydration cured concretes with and without fly ash were exposed to two severe cyclic conditions: (1) chloride immersion/air drying cycles and (2) chloride immersion/accelerated weathering carbonation cycles. It was found through one-year cyclic tests that total chloride content was actually reduced by more than 50% in concrete subjected to carbonation curing comparing to hydration reference. Reduction in free chloride (water-soluble) in carbonation cured concrete reached more than 60%. It was also found that carbonation cured concrete was not more vulnerable to weathering carbonation. This was attributed to the carbonate-rich surface protective layer which was less permeable, less absorptive, and with comparable pH value, enabling the carbonation cured concretes higher resistance to chloride penetration. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available