4.6 Article

Anomaly Identification of Structural Health Monitoring Data Using Dynamic Independent Component Analysis

Journal

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000905

Keywords

Structural health monitoring; Anomaly identification; Dynamic independent component analysis; Dimensionality reduction; Canonical correlation analysis

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1511000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51625802, 51978128, 51908184]
  3. LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1802035]
  4. Foundation for High Level Talent Innovation Support Program of Dalian [2017RD03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Independent component analysis (ICA) has the potential to identify anomalies in structural health monitoring (SHM) data due to its non-Gaussian data-processing ability. In order to additionally take into account the dynamic property between current and past measurements, this paper proposes to employ the concept of dynamic ICA (DICA) for anomaly identification. However, no standard criterion is available for dimensionality reduction, i.e., to extract the systematic and noisy parts. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) is therefore used to preprocess the time-delayed SHM data where the dynamic behavior is included (CCA is introduced here to serve as a dynamic whitening tool). A direct criterion (i.e., whether the canonical correlation coefficient equals zero) is then presented for extracting systematic and noisy parts, followed by the formulation of a modified DICA method. After that, two statistics are defined to detect potential anomalies, and two corresponding indices are deduced to locate anomaly sources. Case studies using SHM data from a numerical benchmark structure and an actual cable-stayed bridge are finally considered to verify the availability and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available