4.3 Article

Do muscle contractile properties drive differences in locomotor performance in invasive populations ofXenopus laevisin France?

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00360-020-01310-4

Keywords

Xenopus laevis; Muscle; Frog; Adaptation; Locomotion; Performance

Funding

  1. ERA-Net BiodivERsA
  2. ANR
  3. DFG
  4. BELSPO
  5. FCT, as part of the 2013 BiodivERsA call for research proposals
  6. INVAXEN Invasive biology of Xenopus laevis in Europe: ecology, impact and predictive models [ANR-13-EBID-0008-01]
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-EBID-0008] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Jumping and swimming are key locomotor traits in frogs intimately linked to survival and dispersal. French populations of the frogXenopus laevisfrom the invasion front are known to possess greater terrestrial locomotor endurance. Here, we tested whether individuals from the invasion front show differences in their muscle physiology that may underlie the observed whole-organism performance differences. We measured muscle contractile properties of the isolated gastrocnemius muscle in vitro, including isometric stress, activation and relaxation time, and work loop power output, both before and during a period of fatiguing contractions. We found that frogs from the centre of the range can produce tetanus force in their gastrocnemius muscle faster than animals from the periphery of the range, which could contribute to higher performance in one-off jumps. Yet, populations did not differ in muscle endurance. These results, coupled with previous work on this invasive population ofXenopus laevis, suggest that the greater stamina observed in individuals from the periphery may be more due to anatomical differences such as longer hind limbs and larger hearts along with potentially other as of yet untested physiological differences rather than differences in the mechanical properties of skeletal muscle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available