4.7 Article

A separator based on natural illite/smectite clay for highly stable lithium-sulfur batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 576, Issue -, Pages 404-411

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.038

Keywords

Separators; Natural illite/smectite; Polysulfides shuttle; Li-S battery

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51873220]
  2. Foundation for Innovation Groups of Basic Research in Gansu Province, China [17JR5RA306]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In spite of high theoretical specific capacity and specific energy of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, the poor cycle stability caused by polysulfides shuttle severely hinders their real-world applications. Here, a natural clay mineral (illite/smectite, ISC) and carbon black (C) coated Celgard(@)2400 (ISC/C@Celgard) separator is reported. The separator shows super-electrolyte-philicity and good mechanical stability. The low-cost and eco-friendly ISC with abundant -OH groups can quickly trap a lot of polysulfides by Li-O and Li-S bonding with polysulfides. The ISC/C layer with uniform nanopores can also inhibit polysulfides shuttle by physical shield. Moreover, good electrical conductivity of the ISC/C layer can reactivate the adsorbed polysulfides and thus enhance S utilization. So, the separator endows the Li-S battery with very high initial reversible capacity (1322 mA h g(-1)) at 0.1 C and excellent cycle stability with low capacity decay rate (0.054% per cycle) during 500 cycles at 1.0 C. Furthermore, a very high areal capacity (5.9 mAh cm(-2)) is achieved for the battery composed of the separator and the self-supporting high S loading (8.9 mg cm(-2)) CNT/S cathode at 0.32 mA cm(-2). This study opens the possibility of developing advanced separators using natural clay minerals for highly stable Li-S batteries. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available