4.2 Review

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19:Perspectives on their failure in repurposing

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 17-27

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13267

Keywords

chloroquine; COVID-19; dose-response; hydroxychloroquine; interleukin-6; QT interval; viral infections

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current evidence suggests that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are not effective in treating COVID-19 infection, and may cause adverse effects such as QT interval prolongation in some patients. Despite concerns about QT liability, the risk of proarrhythmia is low and manageable with careful monitoring. Efforts to repurpose these drugs for COVID-19 treatment have largely failed due to safety concerns.
What is known and Objective Non-clinical studies suggest that chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have antiviral activities. Early clinical reports of successful HCQ-associated reduction in viral load from small studies in COVID-19 patients spurred a large number of national and international clinical trials to test their therapeutic potential. The objective of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the safety and efficacy of these two agents and to provide a perspective on why their repurposing has hitherto failed. Methods Published studies and rapidly emerging data were reviewed to gather evidence on safety and efficacy of CQ and HCQ in patients with COVID-19 infection or as prophylaxis. The focus is on clinically relevant efficacy endpoints and their adverse effects on QT interval. Results and Discussion At the doses used, the two agents, given alone or with azithromycin (AZM), are not effective in COVID-19 infection. The choice of (typically subtherapeutic) dosing regimens, influenced partly by QT-phobia, varied widely and seems anecdotal without any pharmacologically reliable supporting clinical evidence. A substantial proportion of patients receiving CQ/HCQ/AZM regimen developed QTc interval prolongation, many with absolute QTc interval exceeding the potential proarrhythmic threshold, but very few developed proarrhythmia. What is new and Conclusion The strategy to repurpose CQ/HCQ to combat COVID-19 infection is overshadowed by concerns about their QT liability, resulting in choice of potentially subtherapeutic doses. Although the risk of QT-related proarrhythmia is real, it is low and manageable by careful monitoring. Recent discontinuation of HCQ from at least four large studies effectively marks the end of efforts at repurposing of CQ or HCQ for COVID-19 infection. This episode leaves behind important questions on dose selection and risk/benefit balance in repurposing drugs generally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available