4.6 Article

Incidence and progression of gingival recession over 4 years: A population-based longitudinal study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 114-125

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13383

Keywords

Brazil; cohort; epidemiology; gingival recession

Funding

  1. National Coordination of Post-graduate Education (CAPES) [001]
  2. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (PROPESQ)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed a high incidence and progression of gingival recession in a general urban Brazilian population of adults, with correlations to the severity of periodontitis and proximal attachment loss.
Aim To describe changes in gingival recession (GR) at buccal and palatal sites in adults over an average follow-up of 4 years. Materials and methods Baseline data were obtained from a multistage probabilistic representative sample of 1023 individuals aged >= 35 years from Porto Alegre, Brazil. Buccal and palatal/lingual GR were analysed. Results 402 individuals (6,862 teeth) were followed. At baseline, 3,356 (48.9%) teeth did not have GR at the buccal site and 1206 developed the condition overtime (incidence =35.9%; 95% CI 32.6-38.9). Percentage of incident teeth was higher among individuals with (42.3%) than those without (29.5%) periodontitis stages III/IV. Also, 38.5% of teeth with proximal attachment loss at follow-up had incident GR compared to 7.6% of those without proximal attachment loss. Incidence of palatal GR was observed in 32.5% of teeth (95% CI 29.7-35.3). Mean buccal and palatal/lingual GR incidence was 2.11 mm and 2.33 mm, whereas buccal and palatal/lingual GR progression equalled 0.40 mm and 0.48 mm. The prevalence of GR >= 3 mm increased in individuals with (from 35.9% to 47.4%) and without (from 25.2 to 41.5%) periodontitis. Conclusion Incidence and progression of GR are high in a general urban Brazilian population of adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available