4.7 Article

Rheological and fresh properties of self-compacting concretes containing coarse and fine recycled concrete aggregates

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages 622-630

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.073

Keywords

Recycled concrete aggregate; Self-compacting concrete; Rheology; Fresh properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the rheological and fresh properties of self-compacting concrete (SCC) using recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) as both coarse and fine aggregates have been investigated. SCC mixtures were prepared containing natural aggregate replacements at the levels of 0, 50 and 100% for coarse recycled concrete aggregates (CRCA) and in each series of mixtures fine recycled concrete aggregate (FRCA) replacements were varied at the levels of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100%. In all concrete mixtures, 20% of cement content was replaced with fly ash (FA) and water-to-binder ratio (w/b) was used as 0.32. HerschelBulkley and modified Bingham models were adopted in this paper instead of traditional Bingham model to describe the rheological behaviour of SCC with'RCA indicating a non-linear and shear thickening behaviour due to lower yield stress close to zero. The influence of RCA replacements on the shear thickening behaviour of SCC was explained using the rheological analyses. The slump flow and T-500 time, V-funnel time and L-box height ratio tests were carried out to identify the effects of both CRCA and FRCA utilisations on the fresh properties of SCC. The results reveal that Herschel-Bulkley and modified Bingham models provide well defined rheological representations for SCC with RCA. The self-compactibility characteristics of the concretes are remarkably improved by the replacement levels of CRCA and FRCA used in SCC mixtures. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available