4.6 Article

Translation, culture adaption and psychometric testing of the MISSCARE Survey-Swedish version

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
Volume 29, Issue 23-24, Pages 4645-4652

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15505

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To translate theMISSCARE Surveyinto Swedish and establish its validity and reliability by evaluating its psychometric properties. Background Missed nursing care is defined as any aspect of required nursing care that is omitted or delayed. The consequence of missed nursing care is a threat to patient safety. TheMISSCARE Surveyis an American instrument measuring missed nursing care activities (part A) and its reasons (part B). Methods The translation was accomplished according to World Health Organization guidelines, focusing on a culture adaptation. Acceptability, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency were analysed. The Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) was used as reporting checklist. Results The translation and culture adaptation needed several revisions. A total of 126 nurses answered the test and retest which showed acceptability of missing data. The factor analysis revealed a lack of fit to data for the original factorial structure in part B, while further analysis provided results suggesting a modification based on omitting six items. The internal consistency for part B and its subscales showed good results. Conclusions TheMISSCARE Survey-Swedish version is a reliable and valid instrument, with good psychometric properties. Relevance to clinical practice More reliable language versions of the instrument enable national and international comparisons that could be valuable for nursing managers and/or directors of nursing who are responsible for quality of care and patient safety in the strategic care planning process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available