4.7 Article

Comparison of Agar Dilution to Broth Microdilution for Testing In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against Gram-Negative Bacilli

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00966-20

Keywords

Gram-negative bacilli; Enterobacterales; cefiderocol; agar dilution; broth microdilution; Gram-negative bacteria

Categories

Funding

  1. Shionogi Co., Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the standard agar dilution method (AD) for determining CFDC MICs is unreliable for carbapenem-resistant bacteria, showing significant discordance compared to iron-depleted broth microdilution (ID-BMD). When testing different types of organisms, AD showed lower accuracy and consistency compared to ID-BMD.
Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a siderophore cephalosporin with activity against Gram-negative bacterial species that are resistant to carbapenems and other drugs. The MICs of CFDC were determined for 610 Gram-negative bacilli, including 302 multinational Enterobacterales isolates with characterized mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance, 180 clinical isolates from the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic Laboratories not characterized for specific resistance mechanisms, and 128 isolates with CFDC MICs of >= 8 mu g/ml obtained from International Health Management Associates, Inc. (IHMA, Schaumburg, IL). Broth microdilution using standard cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (BMD) and iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (IDBMD), and agar dilution (AD) using standard Mueller-Hinton agar were performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. MICs were interpreted according to the investigational CLSI, FDA, and EUCAST breakpoints, and results were compared. MICs inhibiting 50 and 90% of organisms (MIC50 and MIC90, respectively), essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), and error of different types were determined. Results showed considerable discordance between AD and ID-BMD. CFDC showed low EA and CA rates and high error rates for AD in comparison to ID-BMD. Overall, this study does not support use of standard AD for determining CFDC MICs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available