4.7 Article

Chloride penetration in cracked mortar and the influence of autogenous crack healing

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 114-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.180

Keywords

Autogenous healing; Marine environment; Sulphate; Ongoing hydration; Calcium carbonate precipitation

Funding

  1. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cracks in cementitious materials have a negative influence on the durability in aggressive environments, especially in marine environments since chlorides and sulphates are able to penetrate faster. Since constructions in marine environments mostly have an important social function with a high economic impact, repair of the cracks is of utmost importance. In this paper, the ability of the material to heal 100 mu m and 300 mu m cracks autogenously in marine environments is investigated. To do so, some Ordinary Portland Cement mortar samples and Blast-furnace Slag blended mortar samples were permanently immersed in chloride solutions as well as in combined chloride and sulphate solutions. Another part of the samples were exposed to wet-dry cycles in water and in chloride solutions. Autogenous crack healing was evaluated by means of microscopic measurements. The resistance against chloride penetration was measured by means of colorimetric measurements and chloride profiles. It was shown that cementitious materials, exposed to a simulated marine environment, are able to heal or seal crack widths up to 100 mu m. Autogenous healing is obtained by ongoing hydration, calcium carbonate precipitation as well as by formation of a layer of magnesium and sulphate reaction products (brucite) at the surface. Furthermore, the resistance against chloride penetration improves due to the healing process. However, the efficiency depends on the initial crack width. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available