4.6 Review

Implications of flavonoids as potential modulators of cancer neovascularity

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 146, Issue 12, Pages 3079-3096

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03383-8

Keywords

Cancer; Tumor angiogenesis; Neovascularity; Flavonoids; VEGF; Anti-cancer therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Qatar National Library
  2. Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic [VEGA 1/0136/19]
  3. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-16-0021]
  4. Operational Programme Research and Innovation - ERDF [ITMS: 26220120053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The formation of new blood vessels from previous ones, angiogenesis, is critical in tissue repair, expansion or remodeling in physiological processes and in various pathologies including cancer. Despite that, the development of anti-angiogenic drugs has great potential as the treatment of cancer faces many problems such as development of the resistance to treatment or an improperly selected therapy approach. An evaluation of predictive markers in personalized medicine could significantly improve treatment outcomes in many patients. Methods This comprehensive review emphasizes the anticancer potential of flavonoids mediated by their anti-angiogenic efficacy evaluated in current preclinical and clinical cancer research. Results and conclusion Flavonoids are important groups of phytochemicals present in common diet. Flavonoids show significant anticancer effects. The anti-angiogenic effects of flavonoids are currently a widely discussed topic of preclinical cancer research. Flavonoids are able to regulate the process of tumor angiogenesis through modulation of signaling molecules such as VEGF, MMPs, ILs, HIF or others. However, the evaluation of the anti-angiogenic potential of flavonoids within the clinical studies is not frequently discussed and is still of significant scientific interest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available