4.6 Article

Blends of poly(ester urethane)s and polyesters as a general design approach for triple-shape memory polymers

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 138, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.49935

Keywords

blends; elastomers; polyurethane; stimuli-sensitive polymers; thermoplastics

Funding

  1. Adolphe Merkle Foundation
  2. Innosuisse Schweizerische Agentur fur Innovationsforderung [25751.1 PFNM-NM]
  3. KTI Comission for Technology and Innovation
  4. Sonova AG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blending poly(ester urethane)s with a second polyester of different melting temperature can create triple-shape memory polymers with two different temporary shapes. These blends exhibit high fixities and recovery rates, while maintaining attractive mechanical properties.
Poly(ester urethane)s represent a widely investigated class of thermoplastic polymers that exhibit a thermally triggered dual shape memory effect. This behavior is the result of urethane-rich hard segments that define the permanent shape, while domains formed by the crystallizable polyester segments act as the memory switch. We show here that blending poly(ester urethane)s with a second polyester having a different melting temperature is a straightforward and possibly general approach to create triple-shape memory polymers, in which two different temporary shapes can be programmed. To demonstrate this, we blended a poly(ester urethane) containing crystallizable poly(1,4-butylene adipate) segments with poly(butylene succinate) or poly(hexamethylene dodecanoate). The blends microphase separate and the different polyester segments form separate semicrystalline domains, which serve as switching elements that can be activated at different temperatures. The blends retain attractive mechanical properties and the shape memory characteristics are characterized by high fixities (70%-96%) and recovery rates (82%-94%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available