4.6 Article

Nonlinear tensile behavior of cotton fabric reinforced polypropylene composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 138, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.49780

Keywords

applications; cellulose and other wood products; textiles; thermoplastics; theory and modeling

Funding

  1. Education Department of Guizhou province [[2017] 136, [2017]003]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [31870547]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFD1101203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized the Ramberg-Osgood relation and Maxwell model to analyze the stress-strain behavior of CFRLs, finding that the Maxwell model accurately described CFRLs' tensile behavior at low strain but had discrepancies at strains above 5%. To address this, a TVM model with time-varying viscosity was introduced to better describe the entire tensile process of CFRLs.
From the perspectives of elastoplasticity (nontime-dependent) and viscoelasticity (time-dependent), the Ramberg-Osgood relation and time-varying viscosity Maxwell (TVM) models were used to model and analyze the stress-strain behavior of cotton fabric-reinforced polypropylene composites (CFRLs), respectively. The Ramberg-Osgood relation could well describe the tensile behavior of CFRLs as an elastoplastic behavior, while the tensile behavior could also be described as a nonlinear viscoelasticity behavior by Maxwell model. The fitting results showed that the Maxwell model accurately described the tensile behavior of different CFRLs samples under low strain, but there was a considerable gap between the test data and model values when the strain was greater than 5%. Therefore, a time-varying viscosity fluid damper was used instead of a Newtonian fluid damper to modify the Maxwell model, namely the TVM model. The TVM model closely described the stress-strain behavior during the entire tensile process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available