4.6 Article

Thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane prepared from polyvinyl chloride/cellulose carbamate substrate and its potential application in brackish water desalination

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 138, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.49939

Keywords

membranes; separation techniques

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China for National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0400702-6]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the performance improvement of CC blend in FO membranes, showing enhanced porosity and hydrophilicity in substrates with the introduction of CC. The rejection layer presents better morphology, with the optimal blend ratio of 10% CC.
Synthesized by the reaction between alpha-cellulose and m-tolyl isocyanate (MTI), cellulose carbamate (CC) was blended with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) to fabricate substrates for thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. The introduction of CC into substrates improved both membrane structure and performance. The substrates exhibited higher porosity and hydrophilicity, and better connective pore structure; while rejection layer exhibited better morphology but limited cross-linked degree decrease after the introduction of CC. According to the results, the CC blend ratio of 10% was the optimal ratio. With this blend ratio, the TFC-10 membrane presented favorable water permeability (1.86 LMH/bar) and structure parameter (337 mu m), which resulted in excellent FO performance (water flux with a value of 40.40 LMH and specific salt flux with a value of 0.099 g/L under rejection layer faces draw solution [DS] mode when 1 M NaCl and deionized water were utilized as DS and feed solution). In addition, the TFC-10 membrane showed good water flux and low-sulfate ion leakage in the potential application of brackish water desalination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available