4.6 Review

New graduate nurses' clinical competence: A mixed methods systematic review

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
Volume 76, Issue 11, Pages 2810-2829

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14487

Keywords

assessment; clinical competence; competency assessment; literature review; mixed methods; new graduate nurse; nursing; systematic review

Categories

Funding

  1. La Trobe University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To appraise and synthesize evidence of empirical studies reporting assessment of new graduate nurses' clinical competence in clinical settings. Design Mixed methods systematic review. Data sources The search strategy included keywords relevant to: new graduate nurse; clinical competence; and competence assessment. The searched literature databases included CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. The search was limited to full-text papers in English or French, published between 2010 -September 2019. Review Methods Inclusion criteria were: 1) empirical studies; 2) detailed method and complete results sections; 3) competence assessment in clinical settings; and 4) new graduate nurses (<= 24 months). Two independent reviewers screened eligible papers, extracted data and used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool framework for quality appraisal. Divergences were solved through discussion. Results About 42 papers were included in this review: quantitative (N = 31), qualitative (N = 7) and mixed methods (N = 4). Findings suggest that new graduate nurses exhibit a good or adequate level of competence. Longitudinal studies show a significant increase in competence from 0-6 months, but findings are inconsistent from 6-12 months. Conclusion There are a multitude of quantitative tools available to measure clinical competence. This suggests a need for a review of their rigor. Impact No recent reviews comprehensively synthesized the findings from new graduate nurses' clinical competence. This review has found that new graduate nurses' competence has been mostly assessed as good, despite the expectation that they should be more competent. Longitudinal studies did not always show a significant increase in competence. These findings can help nurse educators in providing more support to new graduate nurses throughout the transition period or design improved transition programme. This review also identified quantitative tools and qualitative methods that can be used for competence assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available