4.6 Article

Renewable energy consumption and sustainable development in high-income countries

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2020.1839807

Keywords

Sustainable development; renewable energy; non-renewable energy; high-income countries; panel ARDL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that renewable energy consumption has a positive impact on sustainable development, while non-renewable energy consumption has a negative impact in high-income countries. Therefore, high-income countries should increase renewable energy consumption and reduce non-renewable energy consumption as much as possible.
This study aims to analyse the relationship between renewable energy, non-renewable energy, economic growth and sustainable development in high-income countries. This analysis uses data from 20 high-income countries covering the 1990-2015 period and finds that there is a cointegration relationship among the considered variables. According to the estimation of long-term coefficients for the cointegrated variables, renewable energy consumption has a statistically significant positive effect on sustainable development in the long run. In high-income countries, a 1% increase in renewable energy consumption increases sustainable development by 0.326%. In contrast, non-renewable energy consumption has a statistically significant negative effect on sustainable development in the long run. In high-income countries, a 1% increase in non-renewable energy consumption reduces sustainable development by 1.004%. According to the Granger causality estimates obtained in this study, renewable energy is the cause of sustainable development in both the short and long term. These findings demonstrate the importance of renewable energy consumption to sustainable development in high-income countries. Therefore, while high-income countries increase renewable energy consumption, they should decrease non-renewable energy consumption as much as possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available