4.4 Article

Altitude and Heat Training in Preparation for Competitions in the Heat: A Case Study

Journal

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0292

Keywords

hypoxic training; heat acclimation; elite athletes; periodization

Funding

  1. Australian Institute of Sport and Athletics Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To quantify, for an elite-level racewalker, altitude training, heat acclimation and acclimatization, physiological data, and race performance from January 2007 to August 2008. Methods: The participant performed 7 blocks of altitude training: 2 live high:train high blocks at 1380 m (total = 22 d) and 5 simulated live high:train low blocks at 3000 m/600 m (total = 98 d). Prior to the 2007 World Championships and the 2008 Olympic Games, 2 heat-acclimation blocks of similar to 6 weeks were performed (1 session/week), with similar to 2 weeks of heat acclimatization completed immediately prior to each 20-km event. Results: During the observation period, physiological testing included maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max, mL.kg(-1).min(-1)), walking speed (km.h(-1)) at 4 mmol.L-1 blood lactate concentration [La-], body mass (kg), and hemoglobin mass (g), and 12 x 20-km races and 2 x 50-km races were performed. The highest VO2max was 67.0 mL.kg(-1).min(-1) (August 2007), which improved 3.1% from the first measurement (64.9 mL.kg(-1).min(-1), June 2007). The highest percentage change in any physiological variable was 7.1%, for 4 mmol.L-1 [La-] walking speed, improving from 14.1 (June 2007) to 15.1 km.h(-1) (August 2007). Personal-best times for 20 km improved from (hh:mm:ss) 1:21:36 to 1:19:41 (2.4%) and from 3:55:08 to 3:39:27 (7.1%) in the 50-km event. The participant won Olympic bronze and silver medals in the 20- and 50-km, respectively. Conclusions: Elite racewalkers who regularly perform altitude training may benefit from periodized heat acclimation and acclimatization prior to major international competitions in the heat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available