4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of powder reuse on mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V produced through selective laser melting

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.105273

Keywords

Powder reuse; Powder recycling; Titanium; Additive manufacturing; Direct metal laser sintering

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation's Graduate Research Fellowship Program [NSF SES-1449469]
  2. Air Force Research Laboratory [FA8650-12-2-7230]
  3. America Makes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metallic powder reuse presents attractive economic and environmental advantages for direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). However, continuous recycling of powder raises concerns of powder quality and sintered part performance, and complicates process validation. Efforts to examine the mechanical response of parts built with reused feedstocks are increasingly common in the technical literature, but none have optimized process parameters in DMLS to control for changes in material properties. In this paper, titanium powder reuse was investigated with the objective of optimizing the additive manufacturing (AM) process for reuse. Virgin Ti-6Al-4V powder was cycled a total of eight times through conditions representative of industrial DMLS machines. A full 2(3)-factorial design of experiments (DOE) approach was employed to identify how parameter settings affect mechanical behavior, and include reuse as a process variable. The independent factors (laser power, laser speed, and hatch distance) did not significantly affect mechanical properties; however, measurements of ductility were found to be influenced by some interaction between the factors. These results were attributed to the narrow operating envelope which was required for successfully sintered specimens. Density and chemistry measurements further demonstrated no significant change with respect to reuse. The findings suggest that titanium powder can be reused up to eight times without any noticeable loss in strength or ductility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available