4.6 Article

Considering the needs of indigenous and local populations in conservation programs

Journal

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 245-251

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12843

Keywords

citizenship; environmental stewardship; indigenous peoples; social-environmental policies; social inequities; traditional populations

Funding

  1. Indiana University
  2. Institut d' Etudes Avancees-Paris
  3. Universite Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3
  4. Institut des Hautes Etudes de l'Amerique Latine, Paris

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Local rural and indigenous communities have assumed increasing responsibility for conservation within and between areas buffering the impacts of agricultural or resource-extraction zones and protected areas. Empowering local communities as central partners in conservation and climate-change mitigation has allowed many people to gain access to land and citizenship rights but has provided limited improvements in access to social services and economic opportunities even as expectation about their role as environmental stewards grows. These expectations, however, are inconsistent with reality. We conducted multiple field studies in Brazil since the mid-1980s to illustrate the discrepancies between conservation programs and local conditions and expectations. We suggest that public policies and conservation programs should not delegate responsibility for managing protected areas to local and indigenous communities without considering local needs and expectations and locals' attitudes toward conservation. In other words, behavior that maintains or improves the environment should not be treated as traditional based on the expectations of outsiders. Framing local populations as traditional environmentalists creates contradictions and frustrations for local populations and for conservation professionals and policy makers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available