4.5 Article

Response of breast cancer carcinoma spheroids to combination therapy with radiation and DNA-PK inhibitor: growth arrest without a change in α/β ratio

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 12, Pages 1534-1540

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1838659

Keywords

DNA-PK; NU7441; spheroid; radiotherapy; breast cancer

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute-National Institutes of Health [R01 CA116477, CA187037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Agents that increase tumor radiosensitivity are of interest in improving outcomes in radiotherapy (XRT). DNA-PK inhibitors radiosensitize and alter cell adhesion proteins. We investigated combination radiation and a DNA-PK inhibitor in monolayers vs spheroids. Materials and methods Using HER2 positive mammary carcinoma cells, we investigated the impact of NU7441, a DNA-PK inhibitor, on irradiated monolayer and spheroid cultures. Colony formation assays were performed with monolayer culture cells and spheroids after irradiation with/without NU7441 (5 mu M). Results In monolayer culture cells, alpha/beta increased from 3.0 +/- 0.2 Gy (XRT alone) to 6.9 +/- 0.2 Gy (XRT+NU7441). Corresponding alpha/beta values for cells obtained by disaggregating treated spheroids were 3.6 +/- 0.7 Gy (XRT alone) and 3.5 +/- 0.2 Gy (XRT+NU7441). However, spheroid survival was highly sensitive to NU7441 incubation. After 4 Gy XRT alone 75% of the irradiated spheroids remained intact; when NU7441 treatment was involved, 13% remained intact. No spheroids survived to 3 weeks at 6 Gy or more. The discrepancy between the minimal change in alpha/beta from cells derived from spheroids and the spheroid growth response was not related to poor penetration of NU7441. Conclusions DNA-PK inhibitor NU7441 radiosensitized monolayer cells but not cells obtained from spheroids. NU7441 and radiation increased spheroid fragmentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available