4.1 Article

Sex differences in maturation and aging of human personality on the basis of a recently developed complex hierarchical model of temperament and character

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13651501.2020.1804941

Keywords

Temperament; character; personality; age; maturation; sex differences

Categories

Funding

  1. Janos Bolyai Research Fellowship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  2. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology [UNKP 19-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found age-related changes in higher and lower modules, with differences between genders in all levels of the model.
Objective The current study aimed to determine the changes in psychological function that come with age. The basis to assess psychological function was a hierarchical model of temperament, personality and character, previously developed by the authors. Methods 734 general population subjects completed the TEMPS-A, the TCI and the NEO-PI-3. Data were analysed with ANCOVA models. Results The top superfactors showed no age change, however, age-related changes were identified in the higher and lower modules. There was a pattern of differences between the two genders in all levels of the model. Conclusions While there is stability with the two top factors of personality, there are age-related changes in lower-level modules probably indicating maturation, adaptation or changes in orientation through the adult life span. Gender differences in all levels including the two top superfactors, higher and lower modules reflect and explain differences in multiple aspects of internal experience, interaction and behaviour in the two genders. The results are clinically essential for incorporating age and gender-related differences of experience and behaviour in understanding temperamental implications in affective disorders also impacting their clinical course and management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available