4.6 Article

Effectiveness of a self-management program for joint protection and physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled trial

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103752

Keywords

Joint protection; Physical activity; Quality of life; Randomized controlled trial; Rheumatoid arthritis; Self-efficacy self-management; Nursing

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology , Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A self-management program focusing on joint protection and physical activity for rheumatoid arthritis patients based on self-efficacy theory showed significant improvements in physical functioning, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors. Individualized evaluations and support provided by nurses made it easier for participants to learn and perform the activities. Longer duration of self-management training and increased follow-up time may be beneficial for patients with chronic diseases.
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, systemic disease, which results in progressive destruction of the joints and a reduction in quality of life. Joint protection can minimize injuries that worsen arthritis and pain and certain activities can help patients control or reduce the symptoms of this chronic disease. Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of a self-management program for joint protection and physical activity for patients with rheumatoid arthritis based on self-efficacy theory. Design: A two-arm (experimental vs control) randomized trial. Participants: Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis were recruited from rheumatology departments of a medical center in Northern Taiwan. A total of 224 patients met the inclusion criteria and agreed to partici-pate in the study. Methods: Eligible participants with rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to either an 8-week pro-gram in self-management of joint protection and physical activity with nursing support (intervention group, n = 112) or standard care for rheumatology (control group, n = 112). Outcome variables were assessed at baseline and 2-, 3-, and 6-months after commencement of the intervention, which included measures of disease activity, and self-assessments for self-efficacy, quality of life, and self-management behaviors. Dif-ferences in outcome variables over time between the groups were analyzed with generalized estimating equations; the level of significance was set at p < 05. Results: The mean age of participants was 58.8 years, duration of the rheumatoid arthritis was 10 years, and most participants (86%) were female. Characteristics and assessment variables did not differ between the two groups at baseline. When compared with the control group at 6 months following initiation of the self-management program, participants in the intervention group demonstrated significantly greater im-provement in physical functioning (B = 4.08, p < 05), self-efficacy of pain (B = 4.89, p < .05), and self-management behaviors (B = 4.65, p < 05). Conclusions: A self-management program based on self-efficacy theory that focused on joint protection and physical activities resulted in significant improvements in physical functioning, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors 6 months following commencement of the intervention. Nurses provided individu-alized evaluations and support, which may have made it easier for participants to learn and perform the activities. After commencement of participation in the intervention, no improvements were seen until 6 months of participation. This delay may suggest patients with chronic disease may need a longer duration of self-management training and increased follow-up time to incorporate lifestyle changes. Future studies measuring long-term outcomes are suggested. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available