4.7 Review

The Influence of Nanoparticle Properties on Oral Bioavailability of Drugs

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 6295-6310

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S257269

Keywords

oral bioavailability; nanoparticle properties; size; shape; surface properties

Funding

  1. basic research fund of the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2020YJ0336, 2020YJ0373]
  2. Joint Fund of Luzhou City and Southwest Medical University [2019LZXNYDZ07, 2017LZXNYD-T02]
  3. Science and Technology Fund of Luzhou City [2019-SYF-35]
  4. Science and Technology Innovation Team from Jiucheng Science and Technology Talent Cultivation Plan in Luzhou City [2019-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oral administration has been the most common therapeutic regimen in various diseases because of its high safety, convenience, lower costs, and high compliance of patients. However, susceptible in hostile gastrointestinal (GI) environment, many drugs show poor permeability across GI tract mucus and intestinal epithelium with poor oral absorption and limited therapeutic efficacy. In recent years, nanoparticulate drug delivery systems (NDDS) have become a hot research spot because of their unique advantages including protecting drug from premature degrading and interacting with the physiological environment, increasing intracellular penetration, and enhancing drug absorption. However, a slight change in physicochemistry of nanoparticles can significantly impact their interaction with biological pathways and alter the oral bioavailability of drugs. Hence, this review focuses on the factors affecting oral bioavailability from two aspects. On the one hand, the factors are the biochemical and physiological barriers in oral drugs delivery. On the other hand, the factors are the nanoparticle properties including size, surface properties, and shape of nanoparticles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available