4.5 Article

Identification of critical versus robust processing unit operations determining the physical and biochemical properties of cassava-based semolina (gari)

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 1311-1321

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.14857

Keywords

Cassava; gari; process optimisation; process scale; product quality; quality attributes

Funding

  1. CGIAR Trust Fund
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1178942]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1178942] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gari-making process involves unit operations (U.O.) that can be classified as critical or robust depending on whether they are affected by changes in process scale. Critical operations impact specific quality characteristics, while robust operations remain consistent regardless of scale changes.
The gari-making process involves several unit operations (U.O.), some of which strongly influence the quality of the end product. Two contrasting process scales (laboratory-scale vs conventional) were compared in order to identify which U.O. were affected by the change of scale. U.O. that changed end-product characteristics depending on process scale were deemed critical; whereas U.O. that resulted in similar characteristics were deemed robust. The classification depended on quality attributes considered: rasping and roasting were critical for physical properties, in particular particle size which ranged from 0.44 to 0.89 mm between the two process scales; and robust for biochemical properties. In contrast, fermentation and pressing were critical for biochemical properties such as lactic acid content (0.93-1.88 g/100 g dry matter after pressing), which influences the perception of flavour, and robust for physical properties. This classification between critical and robust operations help quality control of gari, by pinpointing which U.O. control specific quality characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available