4.5 Article

Evaluation of arsenic sorption performance using dendritic anatase and polycrystalline rutile nano-TiO2for environmental applications

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-020-02963-y

Keywords

Field remediation; Sorption; Engineered permeable porous media; Flow rate; Arsenic

Funding

  1. School of Earth, Environmental and Marine Sciences, the Science Technology and Engineering Partnership for Success (STEPS) Endowment from College of Science
  2. Graduate College of the University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two synthetic nano-TiO2-based materials, aggregated dendritic anatase nano-TiO2 and polycrystalline rutile nano-TiO2 attached to the surface of SiO2, were compared for geo-environmental engineering applications. Results showed both materials demonstrated outstanding capabilities for arsenic removal, but the attached form of TiO2 was more effective under fast groundwater flow condition, while the aggregated form was suitable for high arsenic concentration and low water flow rate. Both materials are cost-effective and can be recovered and reused after regeneration process.
Two synthetic nano-TiO2-based materials, aggregated dendritic anatase nano-TiO(2)and polycrystalline rutile nano-TiO(2)attached to the surface of SiO2, were analyzed and compared for geo-environmental engineering applications. Characterization of crystal structure, purity, and morphologic, microscopic features of the materials were examined by X-ray powder diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, and scanning electron microscope, respectively. Arsenic removal rates/efficiencies were compared between the two materials in different settings for laboratory batch experiment. The adsorption curve on arsenic was obtained. Subsequently, different concentrations of arsenic solutions were injected in batches at different flow rates 0.67, 0.83, 1.00, 1.25, 1.67, 2.50, 5.00, and 10.00 ml/min to simulate field conditions. Results show that both of TiO2-based materials demonstrate outstanding capabilities for arsenic removal. Removal rates are 83% (+/- 0.025) and 95% (+/- 0.024) for aggregated TiO2, while 82% (+/- 0.031) for 93% (+/- 0.013) for attached TiO2. Results suggest that attached form of TiO(2)is more effective for arsenic removal under fast groundwater flow condition, while aggregated form TiO(2)can be suitable for high arsenic concentration and low water flow rate. Both materials are considered cost-effective as both can be recovered and reused after regeneration process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available