4.7 Article

Topology optimization of microstructure of solid-oxide fuel cell anode to minimize thermal mismatch

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 3214-3230

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.6018

Keywords

microstructure; solid-oxide fuel cell; thermal mismatch; topology optimization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51737011, 51776172]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermomechanical reliability and lifetime of solid-oxide fuel cells are significantly affected by thermal mismatch between anode and electrolyte layers. This study presents a numerical analysis of topology optimization of the microstructure of Ni-8YSZ anode to minimize the thermal mismatch. The optimized microstructures show high three-phase boundary density and increased Ni-pore interfacial areas, providing potential for enhancing ion conductivities and aiding in the design of future electrodes.
Thermomechanical reliability and lifetime of solid-oxide fuel cells are significantly influenced by thermal mismatch between anode and electrolyte layers. This study presents a numerical analysis of topology optimization of the microstructure of Ni-8YSZ anode to minimize the thermal mismatch of the components. We obtain two 2D microstructures by taking minimum thermal mismatch as object function. The 3D microstructures become fibrous and orthogonal by stretching the 2D microstructures. Results show that the coefficients of thermal expansion of microstructures in the plane parallel to the electrolyte layer are almost equal to those of electrolytes from room temperature to 800 degrees C, which almost completely removes the thermal mismatch. Both microstructures have high three-phase boundary density, which is almost twice or five times that of a typical anode. Compared with the typical anodes, the microstructures have higher Ni-pore interfacial areas and ion conductivities. Optimization results are helpful in the design of future electrodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available