4.5 Article

Summer thermal comfort in Czech cities: measured effects of blue and green features in city centres

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 8, Pages 1277-1289

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00484-020-02010-y

Keywords

Thermal comfort; Heat stress; UTCI; Blue and green infrastructure

Funding

  1. project Identification of locations vulnerable to thermal stress: a tool for sustainable urban planning from the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic [TJ01000118]
  2. Palacky University, Olomouc [GA_PrF_2020_029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted nine case studies on thermal comfort in the public areas of city centres, finding that high vegetation can significantly reduce heat stress, while the cooling effect of low vegetation and water features is minimal. Therefore, urban planning should take into account the cooling potential differences of various types of blue and green infrastructure.
This study consists of nine case studies addressing thermal comfort in the public areas of city centres, with particular emphasis on the measurable effects of blue and green infrastructure on thermal exposure. Daytime on-site measurements were taken in summer in the paved areas of squares, in the proximity of water fountains, and in the shade of trees in order to evaluate levels of heat stress based on the universal thermal climate index (UTCI). The differences in UTCI values between the research points confirm substantial cooling associated with high vegetation (trees induced differences up to 10.5 degrees C in UTCI), while the measurable cooling effect of low vegetation was negligible (not more than 2.3 degrees C UTCI). It was also quite low around water fountains, spray fountains, and misting systems. It follows that municipal authorities should consider the differences in cooling effect potential of individual types of blue and green infrastructure when incorporating climate adaptation measures into urban planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available