4.7 Article

Properties of chitin and chitosan extracted from silkworm pupae and egg shells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages 1296-1304

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.161

Keywords

Silkworm pupae (SP); Silkworm egg shells (SE); Chitin; Chitosan; Cytocompatiblity; Antimicrobial activity

Funding

  1. Center for Incubation, Innovation, Research and Consultancy and Department of Sericulture, Government of Karnataka

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chitin and chitosan from silkworm pupae and egg shells show distinct properties with excellent antimicrobial properties and cytocompatiblity. Spent silkworm pupae and hatched egg shells are discarded as waste but contain valuable carbohydrates, proteins and lipids. Chitosan has excellent antimicrobial properties and is widely used for food, medical and biotechnological applications. In this paper, we report the properties of chitin and chitosan from silkworm pupae and egg shells in comparison to commercially available chitosan. Defatted and deproteinated pupae and shells were demineralized and later deacetylated to form chitosan. Thermal behavior, physical structure, antimicrobial activity and ability to support the attachment and growth of NIH3T3 cells were studied. Chitin and chitosan from both pupae and shells had similar structure and composition. Crystallinity of the pupae chitosan was 48% compared to 38% for egg shell chitosan. Silkworm chitosan showed considerably higher antibacterial and antifungal activity compared to standard. Cells were viable in the presence of pupae and egg shell chitosan in all the concentrations tested. Based on these observations, it can be inferred that silkworm pupae and shells provide a renewable and sustainable source for chitosan with properties suitable for food and medical applications. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available