4.0 Article

Acaricidal activity of the plant sesquiterpenoids α-costic acid and inuloxin A against the cattle ectoparasitic tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACAROLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 409-413

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01647954.2020.1805002

Keywords

Dittrichia viscosa; sesquiterpenoids; inuloxin A; alpha-costic acid; Rhipicephalus(Boophilus)annulatus; cattle tick; acaricidal activity

Categories

Funding

  1. BBCA onlus Foundation, Rome, Italy
  2. Programme STAR 2017
  3. UniNA
  4. Compagnia di San Paolo grant [E62F16001250003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The obligate ectoparasite Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus, also known as cattle tick, is the hard tick vector of babesiosis, a protozoal infection that causes severe meat production losses at huge economic costs. Although babesiosis was eradicated from the United States, its vector still exists in Mexico and different security measures are used to prevent its reintroduction into the U.S. Furthermore, the massive use of chemical acaricides during the last century has resulted in the development of resistance and toxicological problems. A possible and more sustainable alternative could be represented by the applications of biopesticides. Recently, two sesquiterpenoids, inuloxin A and alpha-costic acid isolated fromDittrichia viscosa, a perennial native plant of the Mediterranean basin, showed several interesting biological activities including acaricidal and antifeedant activities. Both inuloxin A and alpha-costic acid caused an impact on the hatch rate of the eggs and a larval mortality rate higher than 80% in vitro bioassays on eggs of R. annulatus. Moreover, the hatch rate of the eggs and the mortality rate of the larvae seem to be dependent on the timing of application of the compounds on the eggs. These results suggested a potential use of both compounds to control R. annulatus. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available