4.4 Review

Is light pollution driving moth population declines? A review of causal mechanisms across the life cycle

Journal

INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 167-187

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/icad.12447

Keywords

Artificial light at night; insect declines; Lepidoptera; meta-analysis; nocturnal; phototaxis; street lighting

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L002590/1]
  2. Butterfly Conservation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of artificial light at night (ALAN) can have diverse impacts on moths, affecting behaviors from flight to reproduction and development. While there is strong evidence for effects on moth behavior and physiology, there is little direct evidence of population-level impacts. Precautionary strategies are recommended to mitigate potential negative effects on insect populations.
The night-time environment is increasingly being lit, often by broad-spectrum lighting, and there is growing evidence that artificial light at night (ALAN) has consequences for ecosystems, potentially contributing to declines in insect populations. Moths are species-rich, sensitive to ALAN, and have undergone declines in Europe, making them the ideal group for investigating the impacts of light pollution on nocturnal insects more broadly. Here, we take a life cycle approach to review the impacts of ALAN on moths, drawing on a range of disciplines including ecology, physiology, and applied entomology. We find evidence of diverse impacts across most life stages and key behaviours. Many studies have examined flight-to-light behaviour in adults and our meta-analysis found that mercury vapour, metal halide, and compact fluorescent bulbs induce this more than LED and sodium lamps. However, we found that ALAN can also disrupt reproduction, larval development, and pupal diapause, with likely negative impacts on individual fitness, and that moths can be indirectly affected via hostplants and predators. These findings indicate that ALAN could also affect day-flying insects through impacts on earlier life stages. Overall, we found strong evidence for effects of artificial light on moth behaviour and physiology, but little rigorous, direct evidence that this scales up to impacts on populations. Crucially, there is a need to determine the potential contribution of ALAN to insect declines, relative to other drivers of change. In the meantime, we recommend precautionary strategies to mitigate possible negative effects of ALAN on insect populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available