4.5 Review

The role of CD8+T lymphocytes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

Journal

INFLAMMATION RESEARCH
Volume 70, Issue 1, Pages 11-18

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00011-020-01408-z

Keywords

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CD8+T lymphocyte; Smoking; Cytotoxic T cell; Lung disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies have found an increase in CD8 + T-cells in the lungs of COPD patients, with enhanced activation but unclear cell phenotype. COPD patients show a higher proportion of type 1 CD8 + (Tc1) cells, but type 2 (Tc2) cells are also increased, with greater expression of cytotoxic proteins. Further research is needed to draw firm conclusions on the role of CD8 + T-cells in COPD.
Objective and design This systematic review aims to establish the role of CD8 + T lymphocytes in COPD. Methods Forty-eight papers published in the last 15 years were identified for inclusion. Results CD8 + T-cells are increased in the lungs of patients with COPD (17 studies, 16 positive) whereas in the circulation, findings were inconclusive. Activation of CD8 + T-cells was enhanced in lungs (four studies, three positive) but cell phenotype was unclear. There was substantial evidence of a higher proportion of type 1 CD8 + (Tc1) cells in COPD (11 studies, 9 positive), though the population of type 2 (Tc2) cells was also increased (5 studies, 4 positive). CD8 + T-cells in COPD exhibited greater expression of cytotoxic proteins (five studies, five positive). Studies assessed a variety of questions so evidence was insufficient to draw firm conclusions. The role of CD8 + T-cells at acute exacerbation of COPD and also their contribution to alveolar destruction can only be hypothesised at this stage. Conclusions Not only is the number of CD8 + T-cells increased in COPD, these cells have increased capacity to exert effector functions and are likely to contribute to disease pathogenesis. Several mechanisms highlighted show promise for future investigation to consolidate current knowledge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available