4.6 Article

Molecular Simulation and Computational Modeling of Gas Separation through Polycarbonate/p-Nitroaniline/Zeolite 4A Mixed Matrix Membranes

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 38, Pages 16772-16785

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02827

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We develop novel methods to estimate the gas permeation within the mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) fabricated by polycarbonate (PC), p-nitroaniline (pNA), and zeolite 4A. To this end, molecular simulation including molecular dynamics and grand ganonical Monte Carlo methods were utilized to determine the diffusivity and solubility coefficients of H-2, CH4, CO2, O-2, and N-2 gas molecules within the PC/pNA/zeolite 4A membranes. Coupled with other analysis such as X-ray diffraction, fractional free volume, and radial distribution function, structural and separation features like glass-transition temperature, mean square displacement, density, and adsorption isotherms define the solution-diffusion separation mechanism. Two state-of-the-art and accurate artificial intelligence (AI) models, viz ant colony optimization-adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ACO-ANFIS) and genetic programming (GP) are developed to estimate the permeability of mentioned gas molecules within the MMMs. The R-2 value for ACO-ANFIS and GP was obtained as 0.97 and 0.96, respectively. The mean squared error value for ACO-ANFIS and GP was obtained as 0.41 and 0.51, respectively. Although the accuracy of ACO-ANFIS is higher, both models can be regarded as efficient models. The findings of the study demonstrate that the AI models are accurate. In addition, the effects of various key parameters like zeolite and pNA loading and kinetic diameter of gases are investigated. Also, it was concluded that the simple PC membrane indicated the best performance compared to other prepared MMMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available