4.8 Article

HIV-1 VRC01 Germline-Targeting Immunogens Select Distinct Epitope-Specific B Cell Receptors

Journal

IMMUNITY
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages 840-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.09.007

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH/NIAID [R01 AI104384, P01 AI138212]
  2. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the United States Department of Energy [DE-AC0205CH11231]
  3. United States Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program
  4. Stanford's Bio-X Interdisciplinary Initiatives Seed Grants Program
  5. James B. Pendleton Charitable Trust of the Formulatrix robotic instrumentation
  6. National Institute of General Medical Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activating precursor B cell receptors of HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies requires specifically designed immunogens. Here, we compared the abilities of three such germline-targeting immunogens against the VRC01-class receptors to activate the targeted B cells in transgenic mice expressing the germline VH of the VRC01 antibody but diverse mouse light chains. lmmunogen-specific VRC01 -like B cells were isolated at different time points after immunization, their VH and VL genes were sequenced, and the corresponding antibodies characterized, VRC01 B cell sub-populations with distinct cross-reactivity properties were activated by each immunogen, and these differences correlated with distinct biophysical and biochemical features of the germline-targeting immunogens. Our study indicates that the design of effective immunogens to activate B cell receptors leading to protective HIV-1 antibodies will require a better understanding of how the biophysical properties of the epitope and its surrounding surface on the germline-targeting immunogen influence its interaction with the available receptor variants in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available