4.8 Article

On the Modeling and Design of Modular Multilevel Converters With Parametric and Model-Form Uncertainty Quantification

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 35, Issue 10, Pages 10168-10179

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2020.2980000

Keywords

Uncertainty; Predictive models; Integrated circuit modeling; Computational modeling; Mathematical model; Power electronics; Analytical models; Design margin; design under uncertainty; model-form uncertainty (MFU); modeling; modular multilevel converter (MMC); parametric uncertainty (PU); uncertainty quantification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modeling and design with parametric and model-form uncertainty quantification is an alternative to conventional model-based design approaches as it improves the existing modeling practice and validates the model used in the design of power converters. However, in the case of modular multilevel converters (MMCs), uncertainty quantification, as the main step in this design methodology, becomes challenging due to the inherent complexity and sheer size of such units. In this article, these limitations are discussed and a systematic study for developing a simplified testbed for uncertainty quantification of an MMC is presented. To this end, first sensitivity analysis is conducted to identify the key parameters whose tolerances contribute the most to the parametric uncertainty of the selected design variables. Second, the effect of increasing the number of power cells in each arm on the estimated total uncertainty, and thus the predictive capability of the MMC simulation models for medium- and high-voltage applications is studied. A simplified testbed for model validation of the power cell in the design of an MMC is developed accordingly. The development of this simplified testbed allows validating the models used and estimating uncertainties in the design with less computational cost and hardware prototyping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available